A Year in the Life of the Supreme Court by Rodney A. Smolla

By Rodney A. Smolla

Despite its significance to the lifetime of the kingdom and all its electorate, the best court docket is still a secret to so much americans, its workings extensively felt yet hardly visible firsthand. during this publication, reporters who disguise the Court—acting because the eyes and ears of not only the yank humans, however the structure itself—give us an extraordinary shut look at its court cases, the folk at the back of them, and the complicated, usually interesting ways that justice is eventually served. Their narratives shape an intimate account of a 12 months within the lifetime of the best Court.
The circumstances heard through the Surpreme court docket are, firstly, disputes concerning actual individuals with genuine tales. The injuries and twists of condition that experience introduced those humans to the final inn of litigation could make for compelling drama. The members to this quantity deliver those dramatic tales to lifestyles, utilizing them as a backdrop for the bigger problems with legislation and social coverage that represent the Court’s company: abortion, separation of church and nation, freedom of speech, the suitable of privateness, crime, violence, discrimination, and the loss of life penalty. during those narratives, the authors describe the personalities and jurisprudential leanings of a few of the Justices, explaining how the interaction of those characters and theories in regards to the structure have interaction to persuade the Court’s decisions.
Highly readable and richly informative, this ebook bargains an strangely transparent and entire portrait of 1 of the main influential associations in glossy American life.

Show description

Read or Download A Year in the Life of the Supreme Court PDF

Best legal history books

Living Law: Reconsidering Eugen Ehrlich (Onati International Series in Law and Society)

Eugen Ehrlich (1862-1922) was once an eminent Austrian felony theorist and professor of Roman legislations. he's thought of through many as one of many 'founding fathers' of recent sociology of legislations. even though the significance of his paintings (including his suggestion of 'living law') is widely known, Ehrlich has no longer but bought the intense foreign cognizance he merits.

Insanity on Trial

The madness protection debate has come complete circle, back. the present around all started whilst John Hinckley opened fireplace; in 1843, it used to be Daniel M'Naghten who pulled the set off; the "acts" of either would-be "insanity acquittees" provoked the click, the population, a President, and a Queen to expressions of concern, and brought on Congress, the home of Lords, judges, jurists, psychologists, and psychiatrists to discuss this such a lot maddening subject.

Until They Are Seven: The Origins of Women's Legal Rights

An soaking up account of the origins of women's rights to estate and youngsters within the united kingdom. a real tale which reads like a Victorian novel. 'In legislation a husband and spouse are one: and that one is the husband': Blackstone This was once the legislations until eventually good into the 19th century. until eventually they're Seven relies on learn into the historic history to the fashionable difficulties of kid custody and entry.

A Search for Sovereignty: Law and Geography in European Empires, 1400-1900

A look for Sovereignty maps a brand new method of international background via studying the relation of legislation and geography in ecu empires among 1400 and 1900. Lauren Benton argues that Europeans imagined imperial house as networks of corridors and enclaves, and they built sovereignty in ways in which merged principles approximately geography and legislation.

Additional resources for A Year in the Life of the Supreme Court

Example text

This pitch would almost certainly get a sympathetic hearing. The Rehnquist Court had in past years at times appeared to go out of its way to limit the reach of federal laws against race bias and sex bias. The Court, for example, limited the effectiveness of the anti-sexdiscrimination provisions of Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, an important federal law that prohibits sex discrimination by educational institutions receiving federal funds, by limiting the reach of the law to cover only the actual department or division within an institution that engaged in discrimination.

There is much to commend the logic of the Court. Laws must be passed for everyone. As long as a law is not passed for the purpose of discriminating against a particular religious sect, it arguably should be upheld even though members of that sect will be forced to sacrifice to comply with it. To use one of the examples cited by the Court, if the government decides that polygamy is illegal, the law should be enforced, and the First Amendment should not be understood as granting a constitutional exception to members of religions who practice polygamy out of religious conviction.

A fourth saw only a Massachusetts state-law pension claim. Mr. Biggins had been fired only six months before his tenth anniversary at Hazen Paper, when he would have qualified for a total of $93,000 in retirement money. Indeed, Mr. Biggins interpreted the pension plan as making him eligible to begin drawing his money as early as June 14, 1986. It was no coincidence, he thought, that he had been fired on June 13. Frustrated by his failure to find an enterprising lawyer, Mr. Biggins almost gave up.

Download PDF sample

A Year in the Life of the Supreme Court by Rodney A. Smolla
Rated 4.35 of 5 – based on 31 votes